PAYING TOO MUCH FOR CAR INSURANCE?

Pinwheel 728x90

A Victims-of-Law Associate

 

HELP KEEP
VICTIMS-OF-LAW
ON THE WEB

SHOP OUR ASSOCIATES

OR CONTRIBUTE NOW

DIRECTORY

HOME

ABOUT / CONTACT

TERMS / CONDITIONS

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

JUSTICE MYTHOLOGY


News & Views

ATTORNEYS & JUDGES

ATTORNEY NEWS

ATTORNEY NEWS REVIEW

ATTORNEYS FEES

JUDICIARY NEWS

BANKRUPTCY COURTS

IMMIGRATION COURTS

JUDICIARY NEWS REVIEW

JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM & INACTIVISM

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM
NEWS & VIEWS

JUDGES SPEAKING OUT
FOR "WE THE PEOPLE"

PERSPECTIVES
 (Personal Observations)

U.S. SUPREME COURT

CURRENT SESSION

GENERAL NEWS & VIEWS


Criminal Law Index

2010 NEWS & VIEWS

Death Penalty

DEATH PENALTY REPORTS
   for 2008

Innocents In Prison

prison reform


DISABILITY LAW

DISABILITY LAW

DISABILITY ARCHIVES


Family Law Index

2010 NEWS & VIEWS

Childrens' rights

Family LAW 

Fatherhood

Motherhood

family LAW articles
 
  Courtesy lawyers weekly

FAMILY LAW REVIEWS


PROBATE LAW

guardianship 2009

GUARDIANSHIP '06-'08


RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION

RELIGIOUS NEWS 2009

RELIGIOUS NEWS 2008

RELIGIOUS NEWS 2007

RELIGIOUS NEWS 2006

FIRST AMENDMENT:
RELIGION & EXPRESSION


Pro Se Index
(Self-Representation)

PRO SE NEWS & VIEWS


REFORMERS

LEGAL ACTIVISTS

LEGAL ACTIVISTS Pg. 2


WHISTLEBLOWER  LAW

LEGAL & COURT BUSINESS

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES


INDEXES
TO SPECIAL
SECTIONS

FEDERAL COURTS INDEX

FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS

JUDGING THE JUDGES
INDEX & RESOURCES

STATE INDEXES

FLORIDA

NEW JERSEY

NEW YORK

SOUTH DAKOTA

PRO SE INDEX

REFORMERS INDEX

WHISTLEBLOWER INDEX


LEGAL RESEARCH

LEGAL RESEARCH
(FREE SITES
)

ALSO SEE INDIVIDUAL STATE INDEXES


RESOURCES & REFORM GROUPS

CRIMINAL LAW

DISABILITY LAW

FAMILY LAW

LEGAL REFORM ACTIVISTS

MAJOR REFORM GROUPS

PRO SE (SELF-HELP)


MEDIA LINKS


PETITIONS

PEOPLE WHO HAVE
GONE PUBLIC


 

SEND NEWS RELEASES

VIA EMAIL

Victims-of-Law
Open Discussion

Click here to join victimsoflaw_discuss
Click to join victimsoflaw_discuss





Condolences
to all the victims
 of terrorism
in all of its forms
whether
foreign or domestic.

 



Eyes on the Judiciary

CLICK HEADLINES TO READ FULL STORIES
UPDATED Mon., Wed., & Friday
Except Holidays

CLICK FOR PREVIOUS WEEK'S JUDICIARY REVIEW

Judiciary in the News

Click headline for full story



UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

SCOTUS 2012 News & Views

SCOTUS  Session 2011-12 Decisions


February 1, 2012 -- February 3, 2012

FEDERAL COURTS

"Equal Justice Under Law" Should Be More Than Just Words

Stephen Wyse, Member of Bar for the U. S. Supreme Court, Huffington Post

02-02-12 -- Tammy Sutherland believed that a state law that declared 911 calls confidential if they didn't result in criminal charges meant what it said. So she believed the law would prevent a recorded call from years earlier about her husband shooting a family computer was private and further believed that a federal law that prevented disclosure of her driving records would permit her to hold her husband's political opponents accountable for violating these privacy protections. In addition, that a "Senior" judge would answer the challenge as to whether he maintained the Article III jurisdiction to hear her case. On January 23rd the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) refused to hear an appeal from a decision of the 8th Circuit in her case, Sutherland v. Massa. . . . In Sutherland, the lower court decided that the records in question were not of an "intimate" enough nature to earn a constitutional right to privacy. This act of inaction is just the latest example of de facto Avoidance Doctrine that has emerged in the Supreme Court. Under this doctrine the highest court in the land continues to permit lower courts to ignore congressionally enacted statutes and even on-point Supreme Court precedents. The result is a disjointed system of federal law that undermines basic American legal principles and equal justice for everyone.


Roommate site does not violate housing laws

Thomson Reuters News & Insight  

02-02-12 -- A roommate-matching website that allows users to hunt for living partners based on gender and sexual orientation does not violate fair-housing laws that ban discrimination, a federal appeals court ruled on Thursday. . . . Fair Housing Councils in California sued Roommates.com LLC in 2003, accusing the company of violating federal and state laws that prohibit discrimination in the sale or rental of a residence. But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit refused to apply the laws to roommate relationships. . . . While the federal law was designed to prevent landlords from discriminating against tenants, the court found no indication Congress intended to regulate relationships inside the home. . . . "Taking on a roommate means giving him full access to the space where we are most vulnerable," Chief Judge Alex Kozinski wrote for the three-judge panel. To prevent people from choosing roommates with compatible lifestyles would be "a serious invasion of privacy, autonomy and security," the panel ruled.


Rights group sues U.S. for 'targeted killing' memos

Thomson Reuters News & Insight   

02-02-12 -- The U.S. Justice Department should be required to disclose the legal justification for strikes that have killed U.S. citizens abroad, a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union said. . . . The lawsuit, filed in Manhattan federal court on Wednesday, comes after the dual U.S.-Yemeni citizen Anwar al-Awlaki was killed in a drone strike in September last year. . . . Awlaki was a suspected al-Qaeda militant. U.S. officials confirmed that a second American, Samir Khan, was also killed in the drone attack. Khan had served as editor of Inspire, a glossy English-language magazine used by Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula as a propaganda and recruitment vehicle. . . . Reuters reported last year that American militants like al-Awlaki are placed on a kill or capture list by a secretive panel of senior U.S. government officials, which then informs the president of its decisions.


Female veteran sues U.S. over denial of full benefits

The Pasadena woman, a 12-year Army veteran who served in Iraq, says she was denied full benefits because she is married to a woman. The suit targets the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act.

By Carol J. Williams, Los Angeles Times

02-02-12 -- A Pasadena woman who served 12 years in theU.S. Army, including tours of duty in Iraq, filed suit Wednesday against the Department of Veterans Affairs for denying her full disability benefits because she is married to a woman. . . . The lawsuit filed in federal court in Los Angeles by Tracey Cooper-Harris seeks a ruling that the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutionally discriminates against legally married same-sex couples. . . . Cooper-Harris, who earned the rank of sergeant and more than 20 medals during her Army service, was honorably discharged in 2003 and married her spouse, Maggie, during the six-month period in 2008 when same-sex marriage was legal in California. The veteran who trained and provided care for military service animals, such as explosives-sniffing dogs, has suffered from post-traumatic stress disordersince returning to civilian life and was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis in 2010.


 

NOTE: If ordering from Jurisdictionary, please click from a VoL ad

Win Without a Lawyer

Affordable Step-by-Step Self-Help Tutorials Show How
If You Have a Lawyer - KNOW WHAT SHOULD BE DONE
If You Don't Have a Lawyer - KNOW WHAT YOU MUST DO

Click for instant on-line access

Jurisdictionary®

 


ARIZONA  

Judge: Psychologist believes Tucson shooting rampage suspect still incompetent to stand trial

By Associated Press | Washington Post 

02-02-12 -- A psychologist believes that the suspect in the Tucson shooting rampage that left then-U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords wounded has an improved mental state but remains incompetent to stand trial, a federal judge said in a court filing Thursday. . . . U.S. District Court Judge Larry Burns scheduled a hearing for Monday in San Diego to determine whether Jared Lee Loughner should remain at a federal prison facility in Springfield, Mo., where officials have been forcibly medicating him.


CALIFORNIA  

Who owns your Twitter account? #Itmaynotbeyou

Sheri Qualters, The National Law Journal  

02-02-12 -- Who owns a Twitter account — the person who used it or the company for which he worked at the time? That question has yet to be resolved, but a federal magistrate judge has allowed several claims by PhoneDog LLC against a former independent contractor over a Twitter account to move forward. . . . On Jan. 30, Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James of the Northern District of California Chief denied Noah Kravitz's motion to dismiss two of PhoneDog's amended claims against him stemming from his continued use of a Twitter account he tweeted from while working for PhoneDog. . . . PhoneDog, an online company that reviews mobile products and services, hired Kravitz as a product reviewer and video blogger in April 2006. Kravitz's job was to create written and video content for dissemination to PhoneDog users through Twitter and other media formats. Kravitz was an independent contractor, according to the company's lawyer, John Kirke, of Oakland, Calif.-based Donahue Gallaher Woods. Kravitz's lawyer, Cary Kletter of the San Mateo, Calif.-based Kletter Law Firm, claims that at certain times Kravitz was an employee, and at other he was a contract employee. . . . Kravitz maintained a Twitter account for the company, @PhoneDog Noah, which grew to 17,000 Twitter followers.


Honda loses Civic hybrid Small Claims Court lawsuit

By Jerry Hirsch, Los Angeles Times  

02-01-12 -- The owner of a Honda Civic hybrid won an unusual Small Claims Court lawsuit against American Honda Motor Co. . . . Los Angeles County Superior Court Commissioner Douglas Carnahan ruled that the giant automaker mislead Civic owner Heather Peters when it claimed that the hybrid could achieve as much as 50 miles per gallon. . . . Peters said the Torrance Small Claims Court commissioner awarded her $9,867 in damages, very close to the maximum $10,000 allowed in Small Claims Court that the Los Angeles resident was seeking. . . . “It is a victory for Civic Hybrid owners and consumers everywhere,” Peters said. “Sometimes big justice comes in small packages.” . . .  Her award was far greater than the damages Peters would have collected if she had signed on to a class-action lawsuit settlement that would end larger litigation that makes many of the same claims against Honda.


Sane defendants may be denied self-representation, court rules

The California Supreme Court unanimously decides that a person could be sane enough to be tried but too mentally ill to act as his own lawyer.

By Maura Dolan, Los Angeles Times  

01-31-12 -- Criminal defendants who are sane enough to be tried for a crime may nevertheless be too mentally ill to act as their own lawyers, the California Supreme Court decided unanimously Monday. . . . In rejecting an appeal from a man denied the right to represent himself, the state high court said judges may insist that defendants be represented if they suffer from "a severe mental illness to the point where [they] cannot carry out the basic tasks" needed to mount a defense. . . . But Justice Ming W. Chin, writing for the court, warned judges to apply the standard cautiously. Self-representation should not be denied simply because attorneys on both sides would ensure a more efficient or fairer proceeding, he said.


CONNECTICUT  

Connecticut man can seek payment from 19-year-old child's real father, judge rules

Associated Press | Fox News   

02-02-12 -- Over the years, Eric Fischer had grown suspicious of whether he was really the father of his youngest daughter. So he secretly got a sample of the girl's hair, grabbed one from his own head and sent them to a lab for DNA testing. . . . Sure enough, he was right. The girl was the product of an affair between Fischer's wife, Pamela Tournier, and her business partner, Richard Zollino. . . . Now, five years later, the State Supreme Court has ruled that Fischer can proceed with a lawsuit demanding that the girl's biological father pay him $190,000 -- half the cost of raising her. . . . She's now a young woman of 19. . . . High-level court rulings allowing cuckolded men to seek such reimbursement are rare, though DNA tests are increasingly accessible to suspicious fathers. And when those suspicions are correct, the idea of repayment raises complicated questions about what's best for the child caught in the middle.


FLORIDA  

Attorney: Man adopts girlfriend to preserve trust assets

By Douglas Stanglin, USA TODAY   

02-03-12 -- An attorney for the wealthy Floridian who legally adopted his adult girlfriend says the move is not illegal and was made "with the intention to preserve and grow the assets of the Trust for his two minor children, even should he personally be unable to continue his historical role in achieving these goals." . . . As On Deadline noted in a posting on Thursday, John Goodman, 48, is being sued by the parents of Scott Wilson, 23, who was killed in a traffic accident last February, according to The Palm Beach Post. . . . The newspaper, quoting a sheriff's report, says Goodman ran a stop sign and hit Wilson's car in Wellington, Fla. . . . Wilson's parents have sued Goodman. The trial is set for March 27. . . . The newspaper says Goodman also faces a criminal trial on March 6 on charges of DUI manslaughter, vehicular homicide and leaving the scene of a crash. He could face up to 30 years in prison.


GEORGIA  

Judge: Obama eligible to be Georgia candidate

By Bill Rankin, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution 

02-03-12 -- A state administrative law judge on Friday found that President Barack Obama is eligible to be a candidate in the upcoming Georgia primaries. . . . In a 10-page order, Judge Michael Malihi turned down a challenge filed by members of the so-called "birther" movement. . . . Obama was born in the U.S., Malihi said. "Therefore ... he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen." . . . Malihi's finding goes to the Georgia Secretary of State's Office, which will make the final determination.


MICHIGAN  

Inkster judge says she was denied files to aid her defense

By Joe Rossiter, Detroit Free Press Staff Writer

02-03-12 -- Inkster Chief Judge Sylvia James, who is accused of professional and financial misconduct, testified Thursday that when she was suspended from the bench last year, she was ordered to leave immediately, preventing her from gathering important documents that might have proved useful to her legal defense. . . . James was placed on administrative leave by the Michigan Supreme Court on April 13. She said that despite repeated requests to be allowed back into the court to collect her belongings, she wasn't able to return until three months later. . . . "And when allowed back in were you given free rein to get your belongings together?" her defense attorney Phil Thomas asked. . . . "I was allowed one hour," James replied.


MISSISSIPPI  

Mississippi Supreme Court takes Barbour pardons case

The Associated Press | Clarion Ledger

02-01-12 -- The Mississippi Supreme Court has decided to take up the legal challenge to former Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour's end-of-term pardons. . . . The Supreme Court scheduled a hearing for Feb. 9. The Supreme Court's ruling late Wednesday means a lower court hearing on the matter won't happen Friday.


Justices may eye pardons

Attorney for former inmates hopes to halt nullification effort

Written by Jessica Bakeman, The Clarion-Ledger

01-30-12 -- Attorneys on both sides of the battle over former Gov. Haley Barbour's pardons are criticizing each other for distracting from the central constitutional issue with unimportant, unsubstantiated claims. . . . Tom Fortner, the attorney for four of the five pardoned criminals who worked as trusties at the Governor's Mansion, filed a petition Monday asking the Mississippi Supreme Court to give immediate consideration to the case, through which the attorney general's office aims to overturn most of the 203 pardons Barbour granted during his two terms. A hearing is scheduled before Hinds County Circuit Court Judge Tomie Green at 1 p.m. Friday. . . . Fortner hopes to stop Green from moving forward because he said it's not constitutional for a judge to review a governor's pardon power. If Green overturned the former trusties' pardons Friday, they could land back in prison.


PAYING TOO MUCH FOR CAR INSURANCE?

Geico

A Victims-of-Law Associate


NEW YORK  

Queens judge steps down from wrenching custody battle amid accusations by boy's mother

TV commentator says son is suicidal and judge is to blame

By Thomas Zambito / New York Daily News 

02-03-12 -- A Queens judge has decided to back out of a wrenching custody battle involving a 10-year-old boy whose TV commentator mom accused the judge of putting suicidal thoughts in the boy's head. . . . Queens Supreme Court Justice Sidney Strauss announced Friday that he will hand off the case involving Fordham University Law professor Annemarie McAvoy to another judge. . . . Strauss didn't address the nasty allegations lobbed by McAvoy, which caused the case to be moved to a Brooklyn judge for an emergency hearing two weeks ago. . . . “I think Judge Strauss has acted in a very wise way throughout a very difficult process,” said Justice Jeremy Weinstein, the administrative judge for the civil division of Queens Supreme Court. “He wants the case to be done. This matter has dragged on for many months, and that does nobody any good.”


Cop Gets Probation For Planting Drugs After Begging Judge

Written by Associated Press | NewsOne

02-03-12 -- A former New York City police detective who was convicted of planting drugs on two people has been sentenced to probation after asking a judge not to send him to jail. . . . The former detective, Jason Arbeeny, a 14-year police veteran, told Justice Gustin Reichbach of State Supreme Court in Brooklyn that he could not look at himself in the mirror anymore. He then said to the judge, “Please, sir, I’m begging you, don’t send me to jail.” He also apologized to the victims.


State Panel Adopts 'Zubulake' in Faulting Handling of E-Mails

Brendan Pierson, New York Law Journal 

02-01-12 -- TV broadcasting company EchoStar Satellite failed in its duty to preserve relevant e-mails leading up to a $2.5 billion contract dispute with a Cablevision Inc. subsidiary, a unanimous state appeals panel ruled in imposing a sanction of adverse inference at trial. . . . The Jan. 31 decision of the Appellate Division, First Department, in Voom HD Holdings v. EchoStar Satellite LLC, 600292/08, written by Justice Sallie Manzanet-Daniels (See Profile), was the first by a New York state appellate court to apply the standard for spoliation of electronic evidence set forth by Southern District Judge Shira Scheindlin (See Profile) in 2003 in Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC, 220 FRD 212. . . . The Zubulake standard holds that "once a party reasonably anticipates litigation, it must suspend its routine document retention/destruction policy and put in place a 'litigation hold' to ensure the preservation of relevant documents."


NORTH CAROLINA  

Electing judges still works for N.C.

By Scott W. Gaylord Editorial, The News & Observer

02-01-12 -- As the U.S. Supreme Court has acknowledged, "[n]ot only do state court judges possess the power to 'make' common law, but they have the immense power to shape the States' constitutions as well" through their judicial decisions. Since 1868, North Carolinians have elected the members of their judiciary, making our judges directly accountable to the people for these "political" decisions. . . . The North Carolina Bar Association and other groups now seek to replace our system of elections with an appointment-based system, known in legal circles as the Missouri Plan. Under the NCBA's proposal, instead of having open and contested elections to select our judges, a judicial nominating commission would provide the governor with two nominees to fill vacancies that occur on the bench. The governor would be required to appoint one of the nominees, even if she disapproved of both of them. After several years on the bench, the appointed judge would run, uncontested, in a retention election.


PENNSYLVANIA  

Wife charged with perjury in ex-judge's Delco molestation trial

By David O'Reilly, Philadelphia Inquirer Staff Writer

02-03-12 -- The wife of a former Delaware County judge has been criminally charged with lying to conceal his molestations of a young girl. . . . Susan Liberace, 42, of Havertown, gave false testimony before a 2010 grand jury and at the 2011 trial of her husband, District Judge Gerald C. Liberace, according to the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office. . . . She was arraigned Thursday before a Montgomery County district judge and released on $15,000 unsecured bail. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for Tuesday. . . . Gerald Liberace, now 70, was arrested in 2010 after a young woman told authorities he had fondled her in 2004 when she was 12. He denied the allegations. In January 2011, a Montgomery County jury found him guilty of corrupting a minor and endangering the welfare of a minor, and sentenced him to six to 12 months in prison.


Judge's order could force Pittsburgh protesters to move

By Matt Stroud, Thomson Reuters       

02-02-12 -- A Pennsylvania judge on Thursday issued an order that could force the anti-Wall Street protesters in Pittsburgh to leave the Mellon Square property they have inhabited since October. . . . The order by Allegheny County Judge Christine Ward gives protesters three days to clear out once BNY Mellon, which owns the park, files a $10,000 bond with the court. . . . "There is no zoning, constitutional, statutory or common law ground that permits a group of people to take over someone else's private property as taken over BNY Mellon's property here, and effectively prevent the owner from closing its property," the judge's order read.


Orie wants jurors sequestered in trial

By Bobby Kerlik, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review  

02-01-12 -- State Sen. Jane Orie asked an Allegheny County judge to sequester the jury in her upcoming retrial, fearing jurors may hear about a grand jury investigation of her sister, state Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin. . . . The senator's attorney, William Costopoulos, filed the request Monday, citing a Tribune-Review story from last month that said Melvin received a letter informing her she is the target of a county grand jury investigation. . . . "The aforesaid leak of the alleged target letter to Justice Orie Melvin will be revisited by the media during the upcoming trial," Costopoulos wrote. He accused the District Attorney's Office of leaking the information and wrote that "there are compelling reasons" to sequester jurors.


WASHINGTON   

Murder suspect accused in lawyer stabbings allegedly assaults corrections officer

By Diana Hefley, Herald Writer 

02-03-12 -- Just a few hours after prosecutors ratcheted up the murder charge against Joshua Monson, the alleged lawyer stabber reportedly assaulted a Snohomish County corrections officer. . . . Monson already is accused of assaulting a handful of corrections officers at the jail during his year in custody. He's also accused of attacking three of his attorneys with smuggled pencils and one lawyer's own pen. He could face an additional charge in connection with Thursday's assault. . . . The latest attack reportedly occurred while meeting with his attorney at the jail. He was allowed to have one of his hands free to sign some paperwork. That's when he allegedly punched a corrections sergeant in the face, Snohomish County sheriff's Chief Kevin Prentiss said. . . . The sergeant wasn't seriously injured.


HELP KEEP VICTIMS-OF-LAW ON THE WEB
SHOP OUR ADVERTISERS
OR CONTRIBUTE NOW


January 28, 2012 -- January 31, 2012

FEDERAL COURTS

Frito-Lay chips not "all natural": lawsuit

By Jessica Dye, Thomson Reuters    

01-30-12 -- A New York man sued Frito-Lay on Monday, claiming the company misleads consumers with the claim its popular Tostitos and SunChips products are made with "all-natural ingredients." . . . In the proposed class-action lawsuit filed in Brooklyn federal court, plaintiff Chris Shake said the snacks actually contain corn and oils made from genetically engineered plants. . . . Shake said he shelled out an additional 10 cents per ounce of chips to buy the allegedly "all-natural" Tostitos and SunChips instead of a product such as Doritos, which makes no such claim. . . . Independent testing conducted on samples of Frito-Lay products labeled "all natural" uncovered the presence of ingredients - including corn and vegetable oils - made from genetically modified plants, the lawsuit said.


Court to weigh restitution for child porn victim

By Michael Kunzelman, The Associated Press | Statesman  

01-30-12 -- A federal appeals court in New Orleans has agreed to rehear two cases in which a victim of child pornography sought restitution from men who viewed sexually explicit photographs of her on the Internet. . . . The victim in both cases, who is identified only as a woman named "Amy," was a young child when her uncle sexually abused her and widely circulated images of the abuse, according to court records. . . . Last March, a three-judge panel from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Amy is entitled to receive restitution from Doyle Randall Paroline, an east Texas man who pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography. . . . A month later, a different 5th Circuit panel overturned a judge's ruling that New Orleans resident Michael Wright owed Amy more than $500,000 in restitution for viewing photos of her. Wright pleaded guilty to child pornography possession in June 2009.


ALABAMA  

Judge no more: Warner banned from Alabama bench

Written by Brian Lyman, Montgomery Advertiser

01-27-12 -- Former Montgomery County family court Judge Patricia Warner and the Judicial Inquiry Commission filed an agreement Friday that forbids Warner from ever serving as a judge in Alabama again. . . . Warner has lived in North Dakota since abruptly retiring from the bench last June, days before an ethics complaint containing 74 separate charges was filed against her. . . . Under the terms of the agreement, the Alabama Court of Judiciary found that Warner created "the appearance of impropriety" in a child custody case, in violation of Canon 2 of the state Canons of Judicial Ethics. . . . The remaining 73 charges against Warner -- including accusations of mishandled cases and entering orders without hearings or evidence to support them -- were dismissed.


CALIFORNIA  

Judge rules covered police badge serious violation

Bob Egelko, San Francisco Chronicle Staff Writer  

01-31-12 -- An Oakland police officer who covered his nameplate at an Occupy Oakland protest in November, and the lieutenant who failed to report him, committed serious violations of court-approved conduct standards for the city's police force, a federal judge has ruled. . . . A video of the Nov. 2 demonstration showed Officer John Hargraves with tape over his name. Lt. Clifford Wong approached Hargraves and removed the tape but did not report the incident to the internal affairs office, and said later he considered it a minor violation. ***** On Friday, U.S. District Judge Thelton Henderson said Hargraves and Wong had engaged in "the most serious level of misconduct" classified by a 2003 court settlement.


Judge blocks cut to healthcare for poor Californians

Chris Megerian, Los Angeles Times  

01-30-12 -- California’s budget is once again getting tied up in the federal court system. . . . U.S. District Court Judge Christina Snyder said Monday she will temporarily block a 10% cut in Medi-Cal payments to doctors, dentists and other healthcare providers. . . . In a 25-page order, the Los Angeles-based judge said she recognized the state’s budget problems but that the cuts raised the risk of “irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction.” . . . Advocacy groups have warned that reducing spending on Medi-Cal would make it more difficult for poor people to get healthcare. James T. Hay, president of the California Medical Assn., one of the organizations that sued the state to block the cut, called the judge’s decision encouraging.


California's chief justice loses round over Judicial Council power

Patrick McGreevy, Los Angeles Times  

01-30-12 -- The state’s top judge lost a political battle Monday when the state Assembly voted to shift key budget decisions from the state Judicial Council that she heads to local trial courts, some of which have complained about the panel’s handling of money. . . . The legislation, which next goes to the Senate for consideration, was vigorously opposed by California Supreme Court Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, who is also the chairwoman of the Judicial Council.  The council said the bill is an "inappropriate intrusion into the fundamental governance of the judicial branch." . . . But AB 1208 was  supported by a dissident group known as the Alliance of California Judges, which said too much power has been centralized with the statewide court bureaucracy to the detriment of local court operations.


LA to allow press, public into child abuse cases

Associated Press  | San Francisco Chronicle  

01-30-12 -- The presiding judge of Los Angeles' juvenile courts says he will allow better access for the press and public on hearings for child abuse and foster care cases. . . . The Los Angeles Times ( http://lat.ms/AihIEd) reports Judge Michael Nash says the news media is presumed to have a legitimate interest that allows them into hearings.


CONNECTICUT  

Judge Sentences Komisarjevsky To Death

Moments Earlier, Killer Told Court He Has To Learn To Forgive Himself

By Alaine Griffin, The Hartford Courant

01-27-12 -- On the day he was sentenced to execution for the slayings of a mother and her two daughters, Joshua Komisarjevsky kept his finger pointed at his accomplice and insisted he never meant for anyone to die during the July 2007 deadly home invasion in Cheshire. . . . Dr. William PetitJr., the lone survivor of the crime, who worked hard last year to convince state legislators not to repeal the death penalty, wasn't listening. . . . He walked out of the courtroom followed by family members and friends before Komisarjevsky stood to address the court.


FLORIDA  

Judge: Abused boy looks like concentration camp victim

Abused, starved and naked, a 9-year-old boy was rescued by neighbors when he was found on the streets. A Miami judge Monday demanded to know how it happened.

By Carol Marbin Miller & David Ovalle, The Miami Herald

01-30-12 -- Joseph Lee studied a color snapshot of his 9-year-old nephew Monday as a Miami child-welfare judge glanced at Lee. . . . The judge was looking for signs that Lee was as disturbed by the photo as she was. But Lee simply stared at the picture. . . . “I’m looking for words,” Lee said. “I was not aware of any of this.” . . . The photo, which was not released publicly, depicted a little boy who had become so emaciated that his bones protruded from his skin, and his eyes bulged from their sockets, Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Cindy Lederman said. She likened him to a concentration camp survivor. . . . The boy was discovered by police wandering his North Miami Beach neighborhood Saturday — beaten, naked and starving. His parents, 34-year-old Marsee Strong and 40-year-old Edward Bailey, remain at the Miami-Dade County Jail on charges of aggravated child abuse and neglect. On Monday afternoon, they were still jailed and had yet to post $65,000 bail. . . . The boy and four of his siblings were placed in the custody of Lee, a maternal uncle who was ordered by the judge not to allow the boy’s parents any contact with him. Lee also agreed to adopt the children if their parents are unable to regain custody. The boy also has an 18-year-old sister who is pregnant.


GEORGIA  

'Birthers' crowd Georgia courtroom
Obama and his lawyer skip hearing on ballot eligibility 'at your own peril,' says Secretary of State Brian Kemp

By Mark Niesse, Daily Report On-Line Staff Reporter 

01-27-12 -- President Barack Obama and his attorney skipped a Thursday hearing challenging his eligibility to appear on Georgia's Democratic primary ballot, leaving his opponents to make uncontested claims that he isn't a "natural born citizen" as required by the Constitution and that he faked his birth certificate. . . . The judge overseeing the case, Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings Deputy Chief Judge Michael M. Malihi, didn't rule Thursday on whether Obama's name should appear on the March 6 primary ballot. Nor did Malihi say how soon he will make a recommendation on the case to Secretary of State Brian Kemp, a Republican. . . . Obama's Atlanta lawyer, Michael K. Jablonski, told Kemp in a letter on Wednesday that he wouldn't attend the hearing.


IOWA  

Judge approves ‘fire sale’ of seized llamas

Associated Press | Galesburg Register-Mail  

01-31-12 -- Federal bankruptcy officials in Iowa were bailed out of the llama business Monday, two weeks after they unwittingly got into it.  . . . In a highly unusual proceeding, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Paul Kilburg approved the “fire sale” of 18 llamas seized Jan. 16 from Ryan Patrick Scott, a self-proclaimed priest who accumulated a litany of financial problems and aliases as he bounced from Wisconsin to North Dakota to Illinois to Iowa in the last two decades.  . . . The herd was immediately auctioned off for $7,500, and will go to the Iowa llama farmers who have been caring for them under federal supervision.  . . . Authorities took control of the animals after Scott filed for bankruptcy in Iowa, where he led a religious community housed in a former county mental health institution in Independence. His group, which consists of a handful of followers and is disavowed by the Catholic Church, raised llamas and sold wool on the side before abandoning the property.


KANSAS  

Two Kansas judges contributed to anti-abortion PAC

Dave Helling, The Kansas City Star 

01-30-12 -- Campaign finance records show that at least two sitting Sedgwick County, Kan., judges have made contributions to the state's leading anti-abortion political action committee — after hearing cases involving abortion-related issues. . . . Judges Eric Yost and Jeffrey Goering each gave $100 to the Kansans for Life PAC in 2011, according to the group's finance disclosure statement. In January 2011, Goering issued a temporary order prohibiting a Wichita doctor from using her office for abortions because her landlord believed it would create a nuisance. . . . And in the mid 2000s, Yost was involved in the long-running legal dispute between former Kansas attorney general Phill Kline and George Tiller, an abortion provider who was shot to death in 2009. . . . Neither judge’s donation is considered improper under current Kansas laws and regulations.


MICHIGAN  

Suspended Inkster judge insists charges political

By Doug Guthrie, The Detroit News  

01-31-12 -- Facing her second week of testimony, suspended 22nd District Judge Sylvia James said Monday that political revenge is why she is appearing before the state Judicial Tenure Commission on allegations she violated ethics and misspent public funds. . . . "War had been declared on me and my court," James testified. She claims the dispute began in 2006, when she opposed a bid by Inkster Mayor Hilliard Hampton to amend the city charter so he could take control of city operations. James wrote public letters against the proposal, which voters defeated. . . . James allegedly spent court funds on travel, flowers, catering, landscaping, a parade float, bonus pay for court staffers, Inkster High School junior varsity cheerleader uniforms, and contributions to social and charitable groups.


Hit man tries to clear teen of murders

Associated Press | CBS News 

01-30-12 -- A Detroit hit man in prison for eight murders said he's willing to publicly take responsibility for four more to help clear a young man who claims he's innocent of the slayings and confessed at age 14 only to satisfy police. . . . Vincent Smothers' testimony would be the most crucial evidence yet to try to persuade a judge to throw out Davontae Sanford's guilty plea and free him from a nearly 40-year prison sentence. In an interview with The Associated Press, Smothers declared: "He's not guilty. He didn't do it." . . . Smothers said he never used a 14-year-old accomplice - blind in one eye and learning disabled - to carry out his paid hits, mostly victims tied to Detroit's drug trade. Ironically, there's no dispute that Smothers confessed to the so-called Runyon Street slayings when he was captured in 2008, but prosecutors have never charged him and never explained why. . . . "I understand what prison life is like; it's miserable. To be here and be innocent: I don't know what it's like," Smothers said of Sanford, who is now 19. "He's a kid, and I hate for him to do the kind of time they're giving him." . . . Told about the AP interview, Sanford's attorney said she soon would ask a judge to bring Smothers to court.


Justice frustrated over emergency-manager case

By Ed White Associated Press | Chicago Tribune

01-30-12 -- After more than five months, a Michigan Supreme Court justice is growing impatient over the court's failure to declare whether it will review the state's controversial emergency-manager law. . . . Justice Stephen Markman, a Republican, said the public deserves a decision about a law that gives managers extraordinary power to alter union contracts, sell assets and cut spending in poor school districts and local governments. A manager soon could be sent to Detroit if a review teams finds a financial emergency there. . . . Opponents filed a lawsuit last year to stop the law. In August, Republican Gov. Rick Snyder took the rare step of asking the Supreme Court to leapfrog Ingham County court and quickly settle the matter. The court said it "remains under consideration."


Expelled EMU counseling student wins OK to sue after refusal to advise gays, lesbians

By David Ashenfelter, Detroit Free Press Staff Writer

01-27-12 -- An Eastern Michigan University student who was expelled from a counseling program because she refused to counsel gays and lesbians about their lifestyles won a key victory today in the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. . . . A three-member panel of the court said Julea Ward can argue her religious discrimination suit against the university before a federal court jury in Detroit. . . . “Ward’s free speech claim deserves to go to a jury,” Judge Jeffrey Sutton said in an opinion joined by Julia Gibbons and John Adams. Adams is a federal district judge from northern Ohio who was sitting by designation on the appeals court.


MISSISSIPPI  

Attorney general: Getting pardoned Mississippi murderers difficult

By the CNN Wire Staff 

01-31-12 -- Getting the convicted murderers pardoned by outgoing Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour back in prison is like "being on a manhunt with one arm tied behind my back," the state's attorney general said. . . . Highlighting the difficulty is the case of Joseph Ozment, whom authorities finally located Monday in Wyoming, said Jim Hood, the attorney general. . . . "We can't treat him as an escapee. He has a document that says he's a free man as of now," said Hood. "All we have is a civil document we served him with. That is the most we can do. If he doesn't show up in court, we will move to hold him in contempt. That's the difficult part of this process." . . . Ozment's whereabouts had been unknown since his mother picked him up on January 8 after his release. . . . Ozment is one of four convicted murderers Barbour pardoned this month. The others are: David Gatlin, Charles Hooker and Anthony McCray.


MONTANA  

22 more charges filed against Butte justice of the peace

By George Plaven of The Montana Standard, The Billings Gazette

01-30-12 -- A Butte justice of the peace accused of "doctor shopping" for methadone prescriptions in 2010 now faces 34 felony drug charges over two counties. . . . State prosecutors filed 12 counts of fraudulently obtaining dangerous drugs against Bob Lee Friday in Anaconda-Deer Lodge County, and filed 22 more Monday in Jefferson County. . . . The 14-page case affidavit details multiple incidents involving Lee, who allegedly filled 35 prescriptions for methadone in 2010 while alternating between doctors in Whitehall, Anaconda and Butte. . . . Lee, who is in his late 60s, is not in jail, and instead has a notice to make his initial appearance in Anaconda district court at 9 a.m. Feb. 8 before Judge Ray Dayton. . . . It is not yet known whether both sets of charges will be consolidated into a single case.


NEW JERSEY  

N.J. senator: State Supreme Court nominee's confirmation chances 'jeopardized' by legal issues

By Christopher Baxter/Statehouse Bureau The Star-Ledger

01-31-12 -- The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said Monday that Gov. Chris Christie’s nomination of Phillip Kwon to the state Supreme Court was endangered in the wake of a report that federal authorities had reached a $159,629 civil settlement with a wine and liquor store run by his family. . . . "It certainly jeopardizes the nomination," State Sen. Nicholas Scutari (D-Union) said. "When you have such a large pool of people to select from, you shouldn’t have people on (the court) with questionable issues." . . . The case, disclosed in the Sunday Star-Ledger, alleged that on 222 occasions from April 2010 to February 2011, cash deposits of slightly less than $10,000 were illegally placed into the bank account of KCP Wines & Liquor Corp., which is owned by Kwon’s mother and has employed his wife. The deposits totaled more than $2 million, according to court documents.


Liquor store run by Supreme Court nominee's family settles with U.S. authorities over $2M in deposits

By Christopher Baxter/Statehouse Bureau The Star-Ledger

01-29-12 -- A wine and liquor store run by the family of state Supreme Court nominee Phillip Kwon forfeited nearly $160,000 to federal authorities last month to settle civil charges that more than $2 million was deposited into the business’s bank account illegally, court records show. . . . The case, filed in June in U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York, alleged that on 222 occasions from April 2010 to February 2011, cash deposits of slightly less than $10,000 were placed in the business’s checking account to avoid government scrutiny. . . . Under federal law, banks are required to report cash transactions in excess of $10,000 to help law-enforcement officials track large sums of money that may be tied to criminal activity.


NORTH CAROLINA  

Marcus Robinson's lawyer argues statistics show blacks kept off juries in Racial Justice Act hearing

By Paul Woolverton, The Fayetteville Observer Staff Writer 

01-31-12 -- Statistics show that North Carolina prosecutors illegally excluded black jurors from capital murder trials, said a defense lawyer for Marcus Reymond Robinson in the state's first Racial Justice Act evidentiary hearing. . . . Lawyer James E. Ferguson II backed his claim Monday with testimony from a university researcher who analyzed more than 170 capital murder trials in the state. . . . Ferguson and three other lawyers are attempting to persuade Cumberland County Senior Resident Superior Court Judge Greg Weeks to convert Robinson's death sentence to life without parole, on the premise that racism was a factor in jury selection during the 1994 trial. . . . Robinson, who is black, killed a white teenager, Erik Tornblom, in a robbery in 1991. . . . "Race has been a persistent and significant factor in the use of peremptory strikes in North Carolina," Ferguson said in opening statements, referring to how lawyers dismiss potential jurors.


PENNSYLVANIA  

New fire-expert analysis allowed in father's 1990 arson conviction

By Emilie Lounsberry, Philadelphia Inquirer Staff Writer

01-28-12 -- A federal appeals court ruled Friday that a man who contends that he was wrongfully convicted of setting a 1989 fire that killed his daughter may have a prominent fire expert examine any remaining physical evidence to determine whether the fire was accidental. . . . The ruling by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit came in the case of Han Tak Lee, 76, who is serving a life sentence. His lawyers argued that he was convicted by junk science and that research since his 1990 trial has debunked many of what were once considered ironclad indicators of arson.


VERMONT  

Supreme Court orders new trial for man convicted of sexual assault on a child

From Burlington Free Press staff, wire reports

01-27-12 -- The Vermont Supreme Court has ruled that a Somali Bantu immigrant convicted of sexual assault on a child deserves a new trial because a juror might have been influenced by information about Somali culture he found on the Internet. . . . The case, the five justices ruled in a unanimous opinion, raises serious questions about jury conduct in an age when information is obtainable so easily online. . . . Justices noted "the increasing problem of jurors consulting the internet for outside information that this case all too clearly illustrates," read a passage of the opinion, written by Associate Justice Denise Johnson.


WISCONSIN    

The Badgering State: Wis. Battles over Worker’s Rights and Skirmishes in the Supreme Court

By Stephanie Francis Ward, ABA Journal

01-27-12 -- If you believe Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice David T. Prosser Jr., he just wanted to get out a press release. It was June 13, and the justice wanted to announce a decision involving Gov. Scott Walker’s controversial 2011 budget bill eliminating most government employee collective bargaining rights. . . . What followed was a donnybrook among the justices. Before it was over, Prosser stood accused of putting fellow Justice Ann Walsh Bradley in a choke hold. Bradley was accused of putting her fist in Prosser’s face. And the Dane County Sheriff’s Office was placed in the uncomfortable position of having to investigate. . . . In a year filled with political volatility, including a hostile public standoff in the state legislature over the labor rights of the state’s public employees, perhaps the worst evidence of dysfunction in the Badger State proved to be allegations of bad tempers and fisticuffs in the state’s highest courts.


Family Print Center - Save 50% Off Photo Products
Vista Print a Victims-of-Law Associate


January 25, 2012 -- January 27, 2012

FEDERAL COURT NOMINEES

Obama, senators at odds over picks

ABA vetting shows White House wants Pryor for 11th Circuit, Cohen for district court; senators want opposite

By R. Robin McDonald, Daily Report Staff Reporter  

01-26-11 -- The White House and Georgia's U.S. senators may agree that Atlanta lawyers Jill A. Pryor and Mark H. Cohen should be federal judges—but they apparently differ on which lawyer should fill an opening at the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and which one should serve on Atlanta's U.S. District Court. . . . Republican Sens. Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson on Tuesday sent a letter to the White House saying they would support Cohen, a partner at Troutman Sanders, for the 11th Circuit vacancy, and back Pryor, a Bondurant Mixson & Elmore partner, for a vacant post on the district court. . . . In an eight-line letter to the White House counsel, the senators also resurrected the name of a third candidate, U.S. Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker, whose nomination for another district court vacancy was returned to the White House in December at the apparent request of the president's staff. . . . The letter, on Isakson's stationery but signed by both senators, notified White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler that the senators would return "blue slips" to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee on Cohen for the 11th Circuit and Pryor and Walker for the district court. A blue slip is the Senate's traditional indication that a nominee has received the approval of his or her home state senator.


FEDERAL COURTS

Hating on the Ninth Circuit: Funny But a Little Depressing

By Joe Palazzolo, WSJ "Law Blog."

01-26-11 -- Abolish it, says Newt Gingrich. Break it into pieces, says Rick Santorum.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, aka the “poster child for rogue courts” (Santorum’s words), has played the role of political pinata in the race for the Republican presidential nomination. Gingrich has pointed to rulings by Ninth Circuit judges as inspiration for another proposal: That Congress subpoena judges to appear before it to defend controversial opinions. . . . Conventional wisdom says picking on the federal courts is a win-win, since judges are forbidden from endorsing candidates, or maligning them. Maybe so. We asked Ninth Circuit judges to respond to the proposals, anyway. . . . Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, a Reagan appointee, was nonchalant. “I don’t pay particular attention to campaign rhetoric,” he told Law Blog. . . . When asked whether the court-bashing had judges buzzing, he said: “No more than usual. It’s more of a topic of amusement.”


In online child exploitation case, judge issues rare not guilty verdict

Mike Scarcella, The National Law Journal  

01-25-11 -- A Canadian man named Ivan Nitschke, charged in an undercover online sex crime sting in Washington, turned down a plea deal that would have kept him behind bars for nearly four years. . . .Nitschke maintained he was innocent, even taking the stand this week in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to proclaim he had no intent to engage in any unlawful conduct with a minor. . . . By the end of the bench trial, which lasted several days, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg said the prosecution, in his eyes, wasn't a close call. . . . Boasberg on Jan. 24 found Nitschke not guilty and ordered his release from custody. Nitschke had been jailed since his arrest last March in Washington. . . . "The evidence in this case at the conclusion of his testimony clearly dictates one result here, and one result only, and that is not guilty," Boasberg said.


The Red Shoe Diaries, Law Blog Version

By Ashby Jones, WSJ.com's "Law Blog." 

  

01-25-11 -- You know the old knee-slapper: Last night, I went to the fights and a hockey game broke out! (Cue rim shot). . . . Well, yesterday this reporter went to a meeting of impeccably well-dressed fashion A-listers, and a Second Circuit argument broke out! . . . Really and truly, it was quite a scene Tuesday afternoon down at 500 Pearl Street in lower Manhattan, where a three- judge panel heard arguments over a trademark battle between two makers of red-soled shoes: Christian Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent. . . . (Both Louboutin himself and famed designer Diane Von Furstenberg were in Da House. We can also attest that there were more than a few French speakers and red-soled shoes sprinkled throughout the audience as well. Click here for my story in Tuesday’s WSJ.) . . . In any event, the legal issues involved in the case really boil down to two: whether the trademark given to Louboutin on his red soles in 2008 is valid and, if so, whether a line of all-red shoe made by YSL infringed the trademark.


Prosecutors Claim Federal Judge Bias in Lawyer’s Racketeering Case, Ask 3rd Circuit for New Judge

By Martha Neil, ABA Journal

01-25-11 -- Prosecutors are seeking the recusal of the federal judge assigned to hear a criminal racketeering case against a prominent New Jersey defense attorney, contending that U.S. District Judge William Martini is biased against the government. . . . Among other issues, they have contended that Martini erred by severing witness murder conspiracy charges against former state and federal prosecutor Paul Bergrin from the rest of the criminal enterprise racketeering case. A jury deadlocked when that portion of the case was tried last year, resulting in a mistrial.


SAVE AT PETCARE RX

Save Up To 50% At PetCareRx

A Victims-of-Law Associate


ALABAMA  

Ex-HealthSouth Chief Scrushy’s Prison Term Cut to 70 Months

By Sophia Pearson, Bloomberg

01-26-11 -- HealthSouth Corp. founder Richard Scrushy may be freed this year after being resentenced to 70 months in prison for making a campaign contribution to Alabama’s former governor in exchange for a seat on a state hospital board. . . . U.S. District Judge Mark Fuller resentenced Scrushy, 59, today in Montgomery, Alabama, his lawyer, Arthur Leach, said. His original prison term was six years and 10 months. Before today, Scrushy’s projected release date was June 2013, according to the U.S. Bureau of Prisons. . . . “This basically is getting him home 12 months early,” Leach said today in a phone interview. “It allows him to get on with his life, find a job and support his family.”


CALIFORNIA  

Judge strikes down standards for revoking paroles

The Associated Press, San Jose Mercury News   

01-27-11 -- A Sacramento federal judge has struck down California's voter-approved standards for revoking paroles. . . . U.S. District Judge Lawrence Karlton ruled Tuesday that all Proposition 9 provisions for parole revocation are invalid. . . . Proposition 9 was passed by a 54 percent of California voters in November 2008. . . . Among other things, the proposition didn't guarantee parolees a right to present evidence at hearings when they were accused of violating terms of their release.


Train crash victims take bid to exceed limit on damages out of court

Amanda Bronstad, The National Law Journal  

01-25-11 -- Lawyers for victims of a 2008 commuter train crash that killed 24 people in Los Angeles are pushing for the engineer's employer to set up a compensation fund not unlike the one BP PLC established following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. . . . Mark Hiepler of Hiepler & Hiepler in Oxnard, Calif., who represents 17 victims, said that a $200 million settlement reached in June won't cover all of the medical costs for the victims, about 100 of whom suffered severe injuries. He estimated that Veolia Transportation Inc., the private employer of the engineer who steered the Metrolink train head-on into a freight locomotive should provide at least $64 million in additional compensation. . . . The Amtrak Accountability Act of 1997 limits recoveries from train disasters to $200 million.


DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA  

Man Sues Supreme Court Marshal For Right to Hold Sign on Court Grounds

Posted by Zoe Tillman, BLT, The Blog of the Legal Times

01-24-11 -- A Maryland man is suing U.S. Supreme Court Marshal Pamela Talkin, claiming that the rules barring protesters from displaying signs on the high court's grounds are unconstitutional. . . . Harold Hodge Jr., according to the complaint (PDF) filed yesterday in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, was arrested on Jan. 28, 2011 after he walked up the court's steps wearing a sign around his neck that read: "The U.S. Gov. Allows Police To Illegally Murder And Brutalize African Americans And Hispanic People." . . . Hodge was arrested by Supreme Court police and charged with violating a federal law that prohibits the display of flags, banners or other signs on the grounds of the high court. He agreed to stay away from the court and its grounds in exchange for having the charge dismissed on Sept. 14 by the U.S. attorney’s office.


FLORIDA  

Epileptic Driver in Fatal Crash Gets Nine-Year Sentence for Violating Probation by Driving

By Mark Hansen, ABA Journal

01-26-11 -- An epileptic Florida man who admitted driving after his driver's license was revoked for causing a crash that killed a woman has been sentenced to nine years in prison. . . . Emilio Santacruz was sentenced Wednesday in Tampa for violating the terms of his probation by getting a new driver's license after his old license had been revoked, the Tampa Bay Times reports. . . . Santacruz, who has epilepsy, had been driving against his doctor's order in 2002 when he suffered a seizure and crashed his car into a real estate office, killing a woman who worked inside.


GEORGIA  

No ruling in ‘birther' challenge

By Bill Rankin, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution 

01-26-11 -- After hearing evidence with neither President Barack Obama nor his lawyers in attendance, a state administrative law judge on Thursday did not issue a ruling as to whether Obama can be allowed on the state ballot in November. . . . Lawyers for area residents mounting "birther" challenges told Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi that Obama should be found in contempt of court for not appearing when under subpoena to do so. But Malihi did not indicate he would recommend that and cut off one lawyer when he criticized Obama for not attending the hearing. . . . "It shows not just a contempt for this court, but contempt for the judicial branch," lawyer Van Irion told Malihi. . . . "I'm not interested in commentary on that, counselor," Malihi quickly replied.


Will Hustler Magazine Pay $19.6M, $250K or Zip for Running Nude Photos of Slain Woman Without OK?

By Martha Neil, ABA Journal

01-26-11 -- After a professional wrestler made headlines by killing his wife, his son and himself in 2007, a magazine known for its hard-core pornography published, without permission, nude photos from decades earlier that it obtained of Chris Benoit's wife, Nancy. . . . A federal jury in Georgia last year awarded $19.6 million in punitive damages in the case, as well as $125,000 in compensatory damages. The trial judge almost immediately cut the judgment to $250,000, however, citing the state's cap on punitive damages, as the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported at the time.


ILLINOIS  

Wrongfully imprisoned Chicago man wins $25 million in damages

Federal jury award comes after arrest at 13 and 16 years in prison

By Jeremy Gorner, Chicago Tribune reporter 

01-24-11 -- Thaddeus Jimenez was just 13 when he was arrested for the 1993 murder of an older teenager on Chicago's Northwest Side, but after serving more than 16 years in prison, he was exonerated and released from prison in May 2009. . . . On Tuesday, a federal jury awarded Jimenez $25 million in damages, believed to be one of the biggest verdicts of its kind in Chicago. . . . If the verdict holds up on appeal, the city of Chicago would be on the hook for the $25 million, said attorney Jon Loevy. . . . Loevy said police detectives pressured witnesses to say Jimenez was the killer when he wasn't. Not long after he was charged in the slaying, the real killer confessed to the crime on audiotape, Loevy said, but when that evidence was brought to the attention of prosecutors at the time, they sided with the police.


LOUISIANA   

Top La. Court Censures Jurist for Contacting Another Judge to Help Niece Get Protective Order

By Martha Neil, ABA Journal

01-25-11 -- The Louisiana Supreme Court has censured a state-court judge for using the power and prestige of his office to help a niece get a protective order, from another judge, against alleged abuse by the niece's estranged husband, reports the Shreveport Times. . . . Although DeSoto District Judge Robert Burgess said he acted as an uncle, rather than as a judge, in contacting Ouachita officials for information and assistance in getting the protective order, "we do not believe a judge can ‘step out’ of his judicial function so easily,” the court said.


MICHIGAN  

Judge wrote checks for drug court conference although Inkster lacked sentencing program

By Melanie D. Scott, Detroit Free Press 

01-27-11 -- Inkster Chief Judge Sylvia James testified Thursday that she signed checks made out to herself and court employees for thousands of dollars for travel expenses to attend drug court conferences in California and Boston. . . . But Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission associate examiner Margaret Rynier quickly pointed out that the 22nd District Court, which James has presided over since 1989, does not have a drug court program. . . . "Did you write a check to yourself on April 2, 2009, for $2,740.82 to attend the National Association of Drug Court Professionals Conference?" Rynier asked. . . . "Yes," James replied. . . . "Did the 22nd District Court have a drug court program as of the time you authorized these expenditures?" Rynier asked. . . . "No," James replied.


Suspended Inkster judge confronted with hundreds of checks from court fund

By Doug Guthrie, The Detroit News

01-25-11 -- Inkster's suspended 22nd District Judge Sylvia James grew weary Wednesday as she was confronted on the witness stand with questions about hundreds of checks — introduced one at a time — that authorities say show she misused funds from an alternative sentencing program. . . . Testifying at a hearing of the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission, James admitted taking control of the court's community service program account in 2005 after a dispute with the city over paying the court's bills. The program collects fees from convicts who perform community service in lieu of jail time. . . . James was suspended in April by the Michigan Supreme Court, and an audit resulted in ethics charges in October that claim she tapped the fund for travel, landscaping, catering, flowers, untaxed bonus pay for court workers and new uniforms for Inkster High School cheerleaders.


affiliate_link

PowWeb is a Victims-of-Law Affiliate as well as a client of PowWeb


NEVADA  

US judge denies bid for court order to block NV horse roundups; tells critics ‘Go to Congress’

By Associated Press, Washington Post (blog) 

01-27-11 -- A federal judge in Nevada who handed horse protection advocates a rare victory last fall has rejected their latest request to block government roundups of free-roaming mustangs in the West, saying they’ll have to go to Congress if they think the animals are being treated inhumanely and need more protection. . . . U.S. District Judge Howard McKibben granted a temporary restraining order on Aug. 30 that cut short by a day a roundup near the Nevada-Utah line after he determined a helicopter flew too close to a horse in violation of the law. . . .But he said during a hearing in Reno Thursday that he was denying a new injunction request from the Texas-based Free Wild Horse Federation partly because the Bureau of Land Management has made some positive changes since then. He also said he can’t issue injunctions based on speculation about future abuses.


NEW MEXICO  

Former inmate wins $22 million over 'forgotten' solitary confinement

By Bill Mears, CNN   

01-25-11 -- A New Mexico man held in solitary confinement in a county prison for nearly two years without ever being prosecuted has won a $22 million jury award for violation of his constitutional rights, officials said. . . . It is one of the largest federal civil rights settlements in history involving an inmate. Stephen Slevin alleged he was essentially forgotten while in custody. . . . "This has never been about the money," Slevin said in a halting voice outside the federal courthouse in Santa Fe, just after the jury's decision. . . . He suffers from post-traumatic stress from what he called physical and mental mistreatment by corrections officials in Dona Ana County, in the southern part of the state.


NORTH CAROLINA  

Former Death Row Inmate Charged with Threatening Judge Who Once Prosecuted Him

By Mark Hansen, ABA Journal

01-26-11 -- A man who spent 21 years on Ohio's death row before his conviction was overturned in 2008 has been charged with leaving a threatening telephone message for the judge who prosecuted the death penalty case against him. . . . Ken Richey, 47, is accused of calling the Putnam County, Ohio, courthouse on New Year's Eve to warn Judge Randall Basinger, a former county prosecutor, that he was in Ohio and was coming to get him, the Associated Press reports.


Killer says NC death row not so bad (link to letter)

Diane Turbyfill, Gaston Gazette   

01-23-11 -- Danny Robbie Hembree Jr. wrote a letter to The Gazette in which he challenged Gaston County residents to put him to death. . . . The 50-year-old Gaston County man is on death row at Central Prison in Raleigh for suffocating 17-year-old Heather Catterton in 2009. . . . In a letter received Monday, Hembree asked that the newspaper publish an editorial that he wrote. In the two-page document, Hembree says that the warped judicial system will ensure that he lives for decades even though he’s been sentenced to death. . . . The appellate process will keep Hembree alive and well for at least 20 years, he wrote in black ink on the lined notebook paper. . . . “Is the public aware that the chances of my lawful murder taking place in the next 20 years if ever are very slim?” Hembree asked. “Is the public aware that I am a gentleman of leisure, watching color TV in the a/c, reading, taking naps at will, eating three well-balanced meals a day?” / Read Danny Hembree's letter


PENNSYLVANIA  

State justices drop bombshell, hurry to tropics

By Brad Bumsted, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review 

01-27-11 -- One day after issuing but not explaining a bombshell decision to invalidate legislative redistricting maps, three state Supreme Court justices were in San Juan, Puerto Rico attending the Pennsylvania Bar Association's midyear meeting. . . . Chief Justice Ronald Castille of Philadelphia, Justice Michael Eakin of Mechanicsburg and Justice Max Baer of Mt. Lebanon are panelists at the conference that began on Thursday and runs through Saturday, said Marcy Mallory, a bar association spokeswoman. The oceanfront Caribe Hilton, a resort the bar association bills as "one of the most luxurious properties in Puerto Rico," is hosting the event. . . . Castille and Eakin did not return messages seeking comment. . . . Baer could not be reached either. "He actually works a lot when he goes to these," his office spokeswoman said.


Pa. Supreme Court tosses out redrawn legislative districts

Justices consider legislative plan 'contrary to law'

By Tom Barnes and Laura Olson, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette   

01-26-11 -- The state Supreme Court did something Wednesday it hasn't done in the last 40 years: It sent the newly drawn maps of state House and Senate districts back to a reapportionment panel for more work so the districts will conform to state law. . . . Several Democratic lawmakers and citizens had filed challenges in response to the new maps. . . . "This court finds that the final 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Plan is contrary to law," the seven-member court said, in a 4-3 decision. "The plan is remanded to the commission with a directive to reapportion the commonwealth in a manner consistent with the court's opinion, which will follow."


Pennsylvania Supreme Court may be affected by Orie scandal

By Tom Infield, Philadelphia Inquirer Staff Writer

01-25-11 -- For close to two years, Western Pennsylvania has been gripped by the scandalous political saga of the Orie sisters: Jane, the state senator; Joan, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court justice; and Janine, the fiercely loyal sibling. . . . As the scandal has unfolded - over Bonusgate-like allegations that Jane and Janine made state employees do election chores for Joan on state time - a cynical Pittsburgh public often has seemed as bemused as outraged. The Ories, a well-known family in the North Hills, have angrily called it a "vendetta" and a "mob hit" against them by an ambitious district attorney.


RHODE ISLAND  

Student Faces Town’s Wrath in Protest Against a Prayer

By Abby Goodnough, New York Times  

01-26-11 -- She is 16, the daughter of a firefighter and a nurse, a self-proclaimed nerd who loves Harry Potter and Facebook. But Jessica Ahlquist is also an outspoken atheist who has incensed this heavily Roman Catholic city with a successful lawsuit to get a prayer removed from the wall of her high school auditorium, where it has hung for 49 years. . . . A federal judge ruled this month that the prayer’s presence at Cranston High School West was unconstitutional, concluding that it violated the principle of government neutrality in religion. In the weeks since, residents have crowded school board meetings to demand an appeal, Jessica has received online threats and the police have escorted her at school, and Cranston, a dense city of 80,000 just south of Providence, has throbbed with raw emotion. . . . State Representative Peter G. Palumbo, a Democrat from Cranston, called Jessica “an evil little thing” on a popular talk radio show. Three separate florists refused to deliver her roses sent from a national atheist group. The group, the Freedom From Religion Foundation, has filed a complaint with the Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights.


TENNESSEE  

News That Highly Regarded Tenn. Judge Died Unexpectedly Is ‘Like Having the Courthouse Crumble’

By Martha Neil, ABA Journal

01-27-11 -- A Tennessee court is closed today as a tribute to a highly regarded judge who died unexpectedly this week. . . . Hamilton County General Sessions Judge Bob Moon's wife of 35 years found him dead early yesterday at home in front of his computer. He apparently had a heart attack, the Chattanooga Times-Free Press reports. He was 60 years old. . . . “You expect to see him like you would the walls of this building. The idea of Judge Moon being gone today is like having the courthouse crumble,” former prosecutor Lee Davis, who is now a private defense attorney, told the newspaper. The judge was first appointed to a new Sessions Court seat in 1996, then elected to the bench for an eight-year term two years later and again in 2006.


Hawkins Sessions Court judge accused of theft

By Jeff Bobo, timesnews.net  

01-24-11 -- Beleaguered Hawkins County Sessions Court Judge James “Jay” Taylor, already the subject of multiple civil lawsuits and a Tennessee Bureau of Investigation bribery probe, took another hit Tuesday with five charges being leveled against him by the Tennessee Court of the Judiciary. . . . Four of the five charges pertain to allegations of theft: one theft from a client/employee; two allegations of theft from the state in the form of receiving payment for legal services he didn’t render; and one for theft of donations he accepted for a “Citizens Heritage Display” including the Ten Commandments that he planned to have placed in the lobby of the Hawkins County Justice Center. . . . The fifth charge states that Taylor failed to respond to the first four charges within 30 days when notified Dec. 21, 2011.


TEXAS  

Judge Tosses Conviction Of Texas Man Accused Of Sexually Assaulting Infant

by Joseph Shapiro, NPR (blog) 

01-26-11 -- A Texas man whose conviction for sexually assaulting a 6-month-old girl raised questions about the science behind determining how children die has won a key legal battle. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on Wednesday threw out the conviction of Ernie Lopez, ruling that the Amarillo man's original attorneys failed him by not calling potentially important medical experts as witnesses. . . . Now the Amarillo district attorney must decide whether to retry Lopez, who has been in prison for nine years. Lopez is serving a 60-year sentence. . . . Last June, reporting by NPR's investigative unit, working with journalists from PBS Frontline and ProPublica, found that Lopez could have been falsely accused and convicted.


Consumer Group: Supreme Court Favors Businesses

by Anna Whitney, Texas Tribune  

01-26-11 -- In the last 10 years, the majority of Texas Supreme Court decisions have favored corporate interests over consumers, and the panel of judges has repeatedly overstepped its authority by overturning jury verdicts and interpreting the law to benefit the rich, according to a scathing report set to be released today by consumer advocacy group Texas Watch. . . . “The Texas Supreme Court has marched in lock-step to consistently and overwhelmingly reward corporate defendants and the government at the expense of Texas families,” the report says. . . . Texas Watch says in its study, which reviewed court decisions in more than 624 cases in the past 10 years, that the trend started when Gov. Rick Perry began appointing Supreme Court justices in 2000. The report argues that data from court rulings shows that Perry’s appointees “corporatized the court.” But the court, a former justice and conservative groups disagree with the report's conclusions, arguing that a statistical analysis doesn't provide enough context.


VIRGINIA  

Va. man charged with threatening judges, magistrate

By the Associated Press, Washington Post (blog)

01-27-11 -- State police have arrested a New Kent County man and charged him with threatening county judges and a magistrate. . . . Officers arrested 50-year-old Vincent Rera Thursday morning in Williamsburg. . . . State police said in a release that Rera’s arrest follows a complaint from the Supreme Court of Virginia’s Department of Judicial Services. The complaint alleges that Rera stalked and threatened to kill or injure judges and a magistrate in New Kent County in December and January. No other details were given.


Democrats win Va. judicial standoff

By Laura Vozzella, Washington Post (blog) 

01-26-11 -- Democrats in the Virginia Senate won a standoff over judicial appointments Thursday, forcing Republicans to cave in on two nominees to the bench. . . . It was the first demonstration that Democrats, outnumbered this General Assembly session by historic margins in the House and out of power in the evenly split Senate, still have some sway in Richmond. . . . “They blinked,” said Sen. John S. Edwards (D-Roanoke) after the House and Senate voted to reappoint dozens of sitting judges in joint resolutions that no longer included the names of the two disputed nominees.


WISCONSIN    

Free Work for State Judge Puts Michael Best at Center of Wisconsin Political Storm

Posted by Tom Huddleston Jr., AmLaw Daily

01-25-11 -- A Democratic state lawmaker is demanding Wisconsin supreme court justice Michael Gableman's removal from the bench over Gableman's refusal—despite having received thousands of dollars in free legal services from Michael Best & Friedrich—to recuse himself from cases in which the firm represents clients. . . . Citing Gableman's decision to preside over 11 such cases—several of them still active—state representative Kelda Helen Roys is circulating a petition calling on the Legislature to oust him over what she says are violations of state law and the state Code of Judicial Conduct, according to the Wisconsin State Journal. . . The move by Roys—which requires a two-thirds vote in the Senate and Assembly, both of which are controlled by Republicans—does not appear to have fazed Gableman. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports that he insists he won't recuse himself from three of the cases in question, including one involving a controversial new law that limits the power of public unions in the state.


Amazon is a Victims-of-Law Advertiser

Attorney Barbara Johnson believes:

- Americans should have a common purpose
- Americans do not want bitter partisan debates
- Americans do not want "gender wars" and "culture wars"
- Americans want simple problems solved, without regard to special interests.

In her bestseller, Behind the Black Robes: Failed Justice, Attorney Johnson covers every conceivable topic regarding judges, their decisions, and how Americans are victimized by the judicial system. Some of the subjects she hits on are immunity and the pseudo Eleventh Amendment; quasi-judicial, prosecutorial, and qualified Immunities, which she terms “Protecting Judges, Parasites, the Other Enemies of the People”; legal malpractice or “foxes guarding the chicken coops”; problems with transcription companies; intimidation and insolence of judges; rape and date rape; child protection agency cases and governmental kidnapping; fraud and complicity by the Court; child custody; divorce; immigration fraud, and so much more.

Of greatest concerns to her are the immunity enjoyed by our judicial system, and the federal annual bonuses to the States, of which she believes, if abolished, our judicial ills would be cured immediately.

Barbara Johnson is a graduate of the New England School of Law: J.D., and earned her B.A. from Bennington College, along with attending Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Center of International Relations, and Middlebury College’s Russian Summer School.

She was awarded the West Publishing Company Corpus Juris Secundum Series Award, 1987, for highest annual scholastic average, and had her papers selected for the Nathan Burkan Memorial Competition (sponsored by ASCAP: "Patent or Copyright Protection for Computer Programs: A Traditional Legal Comparative Analysis Overlayed with a Linguistic Theory" by the Dean of New England Law School to Competition). She has trial and appellate experience in Massachusetts Superior, District, Probate & Family Courts, Appeals Court, Supreme Judicial Court, U.S. District Court for Massachusetts, has appearedd pro hac vice in the U.S. District Courts in Concord, New Hampshire, and Portland, Maine,and U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

Mrs. Johnson now lives in Costa Rica.


The Courts:

Rochester resident puts American justice on trial

By Tim Louis Macaluso, rochestercitynewspaper

11-25-09 -- In the opening pages of "Ordinary Justice: How America Holds Court," Amy Bach recounts the story of a Texas defense lawyer, Joe Frank Cannon, who literally fell asleep during the trial of his client, Calvin Burdine. . . . After being convicted of murder for shooting a man during a convenience-store robbery, Burdine was sentenced to death. But in a sadly comical turn of events, a panel of federal appellate judges vigorously debated whether Burdine's attorney had violated the Constitution by repeatedly falling asleep, chin-to-chest, during his client's trial. . . . Burdine's death sentence was overturned and he was granted a new trial. But the real question, Bach says, is how did a defense lawyer sleep through a murder trial without a single objection from the judge, prosecutor, jurors, or courtroom witnesses? . . . After eight years of research, Bach found that such cases are not extraordinary. Instead, she says, they occur with disturbing regularity in courtrooms across the country, and require surprisingly little effort to find.


Top

Win Without a Lawyer
Step-by-step tutorials show how.
Legal self-help that works!

Written by an attorney!

Click to Order today!

NOTE: If ordering from Jurisdictionary, please click from a VoL ad as noted above


Domestic Airfare on Sale

Nolo is passionate about making the law accessible to everyone.

A Victims-of-Law Associate


FREE Checks & Business Cards

A Victims-of-Law Advertiser


“Political language…is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.”
--George Orwell


United Civil Rights Councils of America

"Gender neutral. Child positive. Constitution mandatory."

Click for
10 Main Focus Areas


 

Hit Counter

INAUGURATED ON: September 26, 2004
Updated on 02/04/2012